lilypond.org Productions page

[Federico Bruni]

Hello

I was about to send a patch to add a website in the Productions page
(sheets are CC licensed, subscription required):
https://www.baroquemusic.it/

Then I realized that 3 out of 4 projects listed under "Published sheet
music" section are discontinued.
Should we just delete them?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html

Which are the requirements (if any) to be listed on that page? Should
we link only projects following Free Software principles?

If you know of any other project which may be listed there please let
me know.

Thanks
Federico

[Urs Liska]

Hi Federico,

Post by Federico Bruni
Hello
I was about to send a patch to add a website in the Productions page
https://www.baroquemusic.it/
Then I realized that 3 out of 4 projects listed under "Published sheet
music" section are discontinued.
Should we just delete them?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html

You're right, this is quite embarrassing. However, if we remove
everything but Mutopia, it will look even more embarrassing, isn't it? I
have problems with such pages (applies equally to "News" pages) that
reveal more a *lack* of content and activity.

I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but
this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of
new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

Post by Federico Bruni
Which are the requirements (if any) to be listed on that page? Should
we link only projects following Free Software principles?

Yes. When Janek and I wanted to use the award for our Oskar Fried
edition to put some spotlight on LilyPond we could not get it added to
this page. All we could get agreement to was adding a News item about
the fact that we used a crowdfunding campain trying to make it possible
to open source the edition.

Post by Federico Bruni
If you know of any other project which may be listed there please let
me know.

I will have two projects, but it will need a number of months before
they are ready and (in one case) can be publicly disclosed.

Best
Urs

Post by Federico Bruni
Thanks
Federico
_______________________________________________
lilypond-user mailing list
https://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/lilypond-user

[Henning Hraban Ramm]

I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

My only publicly available LilyPond work is http://www.vorwaertsbuchverlag.de/buecher/das-vorwärts-liederbuch
LilyPond isn’t mentioned, and the layout is not by me.


Greetlings, Hraban
---
fiëé visuëlle
Henning Hraban Ramm
https://www.fiee.net

[Sandro Santilli]

Post by Henning Hraban Ramm

I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

My only publicly available LilyPond work is http://www.vorwaertsbuchverlag.de/buecher/das-vorwärts-liederbuch
LilyPond isn’t mentioned, and the layout is not by me.

I've some lilypond files in https://strk.kbt.io/poetry/music

--strk;

[Federico Bruni]

Post by Sandro Santilli

Post by Urs Liska
I think we should rather try to do a general collection among

users (but this should reach more channels than just this list) to
get a number of new entries for the page that makes it a little more
impressive.
My only publicly available LilyPond work is
http://www.vorwaertsbuchverlag.de/buecher/das-vorwärts-liederbuch
LilyPond isn’t mentioned, and the layout is not by me.

I've some lilypond files in https://strk.kbt.io/poetry/music

Thanks, but I see copyrighted music.
I think we should link only to public domain or open content licensed
music.

[Jan-Peter Voigt]

Hi there,

2017/2018 Ortus published the "Markus Passion" by Johann Sebastian Bach
in a reconstructed version by Andreas Fischer:
http://www.ortus-musikverlag.de/en/musik-elbe-oder/om212
(right now the introduction is only available in german, sorry)

LilyPond is not mentioned there, but I created the scores (full-score,
piano-reduction, vocal-score, instrument-parts) with the Gonville font,
using the edition-engraver and with my own templating engine.
If there would be some time I would write an article for
http://lilypondblog.org/ ...

Jan-Peter

Post by Urs Liska
Hi Federico,

Post by Federico Bruni
Hello
I was about to send a patch to add a website in the Productions page
https://www.baroquemusic.it/
Then I realized that 3 out of 4 projects listed under "Published sheet
music" section are discontinued.
Should we just delete them?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html

You're right, this is quite embarrassing. However, if we remove
everything but Mutopia, it will look even more embarrassing, isn't it? I
have problems with such pages (applies equally to "News" pages) that
reveal more a *lack* of content and activity.
I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but
this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of
new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

Post by Federico Bruni
Which are the requirements (if any) to be listed on that page? Should
we link only projects following Free Software principles?

Yes. When Janek and I wanted to use the award for our Oskar Fried
edition to put some spotlight on LilyPond we could not get it added to
this page. All we could get agreement to was adding a News item about
the fact that we used a crowdfunding campain trying to make it possible
to open source the edition.

Post by Federico Bruni
If you know of any other project which may be listed there please let
me know.

I will have two projects, but it will need a number of months before
they are ready and (in one case) can be publicly disclosed.
Best
Urs

Post by Federico Bruni
Thanks
Federico

[Partitura Organum]

Post by Urs Liska
I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but
this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of
new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

A mention of my website would be nice: http://partitura.org
I use Lilypond and Frescobaldi to create new score of organ music from
manuscript sources. Lilypond and Frescobalde are both mentioned, so it
could be a nice showcase.

Regards,
Auke

[Federico Bruni]

Il giorno sab 8 dic 2018 alle 8:55, Partitura Organum

Post by Partitura Organum

Post by Urs Liska
I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users (but
this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a number of
new entries for the page that makes it a little more impressive.

A mention of my website would be nice: http://partitura.org
I use Lilypond and Frescobaldi to create new score of organ music
from manuscript sources. Lilypond and Frescobalde are both mentioned,
so it could be a nice showcase.

This is perfect, I'll add it to the patch I'm working on.
Thanks

[Federico Bruni]

Post by Urs Liska
Hi Federico,

Post by Federico Bruni
Hello
I was about to send a patch to add a website in the Productions page
https://www.baroquemusic.it/
Then I realized that 3 out of 4 projects listed under "Published
sheet music" section are discontinued.
Should we just delete them?
http://lilypond.org/website/productions.html

You're right, this is quite embarrassing. However, if we remove
everything but Mutopia, it will look even more embarrassing, isn't
it? I have problems with such pages (applies equally to "News" pages)
that reveal more a *lack* of content and activity.
I think we should rather try to do a general collection among users
(but this should reach more channels than just this list) to get a
number of new entries for the page that makes it a little more
impressive.

I prefer a small list of active projects than a larger list of mostly
abandoned ones.
We should also point out that the list is limited to a) projects using
LilyPond exclusively (otherwise we might mention also IMSLP) b) works
publicly available and distributed as either public domain or open
content works. This would explain the small list.

Post by Urs Liska

Post by Federico Bruni
If you know of any other project which may be listed there please
let me know.

I will have two projects, but it will need a number of months before
they are ready and (in one case) can be publicly disclosed.

This can be added later.